“X may need dealt with it higher” — Lawyer subpoenaed by Blake Full of life claims that the platform didn’t share data with actress’s authorized crew

An legal professional subpoenaed by Blake Full of life’s authorized crew in reference to the actress’s ongoing authorized battle with Justin Baldoni appeared on the July 20, 2025, episode of Flaawsome Discuss with Kjersti Flaa. In the course of the dialog, the legal professional claimed that though she had been subpoenaed by Full of life by way of X, the platform didn’t share any data with Full of life’s authorized crew.

“I really suppose X may need dealt with this higher than Google and YouTube as a result of what they stated was that we didn’t submit any data. So then it is sensible that they (X) by no means submitted something to them,” she defined.

She added that since X “didn’t ship” something to Full of life’s authorized crew, there wasn’t something for her “at this level to answer” as a result of the subpoena was technically despatched to X.

In the course of the aforementioned episode, the legal professional—who used the X deal with spiritualshift_—additionally shared that the e-mail from X, which included the connected subpoena, talked about there might be “future makes an attempt” from Full of life’s facet relying on how the present request was dealt with.

She stated that the platform referenced probably sharing her “account data” within the occasion of such future makes an attempt from Full of life’s authorized crew. The legal professional expressed confusion over what precisely that entailed. Whereas she assumed it didn’t confer with delicate private particulars like monetary knowledge, she nonetheless questioned what sort of data could be handed on.

“I don’t know what which means … it doesn’t sound prefer it’s private data… like, you understand, the financial institution accounts… (however) I don’t know what they imply by account data,” she remarked.

To confirm the legitimacy of the subpoena and X’s involvement, the legal professional shared that she deliberate to contact the corporate immediately. She hoped to succeed in their authorized division to verify that the e-mail she had obtained was genuine and to make clear what, if something, X had shared with Blake’s authorized crew.

What’s the most recent improvement within the ongoing Blake Full of life vs Justin Baldoni authorized saga?

Based on a Day by day Mail report dated July 19, 2025, the most recent improvement within the Blake Full of life vs. Justin Baldoni authorized saga noticed Full of life allegedly dealt a sobering admonition by the decide overseeing the case.

The decide’s pointed remarks—which echoed Mariah Carey’s viral “I don’t know her” snub—had been delivered the night time earlier than Full of life was scheduled to be deposed, as reported by Web page Six.

Throughout an emergency listening to held on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, a day earlier than Full of life was imagined to be deposed, Baldoni’s legal professional, Kevin Fritz, argued that Full of life was being given “particular therapy just because she’s a star.”

The decide swiftly minimize Fritz off, calling the accusation a “severe difficulty” and urging the usage of extra measured language in court docket.

“There are issues that the court docket is making an attempt to take care of, and it’s useful for me should you body it in language and phrases that the court docket is accustomed to. It doesn’t assist me — and it’s not helped me on this case — to begin throwing round accusations,” Choose Liman said (as per the Day by day Mail report).

Choose Liman additional reiterated his impartiality towards the litigants’ fame:

“I’m properly conscious that your shopper [Baldoni] is an individual of excessive profile. So is the plaintiff [Lively]. I’ve informed you earlier than, earlier than I got here into this case, I didn’t know who your shopper was, I didn’t know who the plaintiff was. Their names had been unknown to me,” he stated.

The decide emphasised that public recognition held no bearing in his courtroom, stressing that, so far as he was involved, “whether or not they have superstar for the time being or not” was “irrelevant.”

“Movie star, as you understand, and everyone is aware of, could be fleeting. It’s additionally not related to the court docket,” Choose Liman added.

Based on the identical Day by day Mail report, following the emergency listening to, Choose Liman ordered Blake Full of life handy over three years of her enterprise information to Baldoni’s authorized crew. Nonetheless, he dominated that her internet price needn’t be disclosed.

The aim of this disclosure, he defined, was to find out whether or not Full of life’s “revenue and bills have modified” in mild of the alleged smear marketing campaign.

The ruling clarified that any claims of economic hurt wanted to be backed by proof. The decide famous that Blake Full of life should present “some foundation for stating that she has suffered financial damages.”

Blake Full of life stays embroiled in a heated authorized battle together with her It Ends With Us co-star Justin Baldoni. The dispute started when Full of life filed a sexual harassment lawsuit towards Baldoni, alleging that he orchestrated a smear marketing campaign towards her.

Baldoni filed a countersuit, alleging defamation by Full of life. Nonetheless, his case was dismissed, and he has not refiled.

At current, the case is in its discovery stage. Blake Full of life was scheduled to be deposed on July 17, 2025, however the deposition has been postponed and rescheduled for July 31, per ABC Information. The trial date is scheduled for March 9, 2026.